Jump to content

User talk:Decade12866: Difference between revisions

From TV-Nihon
Decade12866 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Decade12866 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
For Wizard, you don't need to redo the infobox for the episodes since they're already established. Using a template to call for data for each of those fields would be more memory intensive, anyway, and it's a waste of time to convert them. The method is more for easily creating new pages, not restructuring pre-existing ones.--[[User:Takenoko|Takenoko]] ([[User talk:Takenoko|talk]]) 06:04, 19 March 2015 (PDT)
For Wizard, you don't need to redo the infobox for the episodes since they're already established. Using a template to call for data for each of those fields would be more memory intensive, anyway, and it's a waste of time to convert them. The method is more for easily creating new pages, not restructuring pre-existing ones.--[[User:Takenoko|Takenoko]] ([[User talk:Takenoko|talk]]) 06:04, 19 March 2015 (PDT)
----
----
Okay, so why we did it with Fourze? -- Decade12866
Hi Takenoko,
 
If you look at the Wizard episodes I just updated, I guess this is what you mean? Don't update the infobox with the template, instead just add the thread link and other missing sections.
-- Decade12866

Revision as of 23:59, 20 March 2015

For Wizard, you don't need to redo the infobox for the episodes since they're already established. Using a template to call for data for each of those fields would be more memory intensive, anyway, and it's a waste of time to convert them. The method is more for easily creating new pages, not restructuring pre-existing ones.--Takenoko (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2015 (PDT)


Hi Takenoko,

If you look at the Wizard episodes I just updated, I guess this is what you mean? Don't update the infobox with the template, instead just add the thread link and other missing sections.

-- Decade12866